![]() |
The Film
![]() ![]() The three films in Arrow’s ‘Bloodthirsty Trilogy’ are vampire pictures made by director Yamamoto Michio for Toho Studios. The first film in the series, The Vampire Doll (1970), has been known variously as Legacy of Dracula, Bloodsucking Doll, Fear of the Ghost House, The Night of the Vampire and The Ghost Mansion’s Horror. The second film, Lake of Dracula (1971), was also released as Dracula’s Lust for Blood, Japula(!) and Bloodthirsty Eyes. The third picture, Evil of Dracula (1974) also had an alternative English language title, Bloodthirsty Rose. Rarely seen outside Japan, these three films look sideways at the colour Gothic horror pictures made in Europe and America during the 1960s; in particular, Yamamoto’s three vampire films owe a noticeable debt to the vampire pictures of Hammer, with recognisable elements of Terence Fisher’s Dracula (1958) and Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1965), for example, working their way into Yamamoto’s vampire films by way of homage. The second film in the series, Lake of Dracula, owes a particularly noticeable debt to Fisher’s Brides of Dracula (1960), with its story of a vampire who is kept prisoner by his own family. ![]() At night, Kazuhiko believes that he sees Yuko in the garden. She is dressed in white. He investigates and finds Yuko’s headstone before encountering Yuko herself. She begs him to kill her. In the city, Kazuhiko’s sister Keiko (Matsuo Kayo) and her fiancé Hiroshi (Nakao Akira) become concerned about Kazuhiko’s whereabouts when he doesn’t return home. They decide to drive out to Yuko’s home. When they arrive, Shidu tells them that Kazuhiko left four days prior. However, Keiko is suspicious and insists to Hiroshi that they stay and investigate her brother’s disappearance. When their car is immobilised, they accept Shidu’s offer of a room for the night. ![]() Keiko and Hiroshi investigate in the nearby town, speaking to the local registrar, who tells them that the Nonomura family is ‘cursed by the God of Death’: twenty years prior, Shidu’s family were attacked and killed. Only Shidu was left alive, and nine months later she gave birth to Yuko. Rumour has it that Yuko was the product of a union between Shidu and her family’s murderer. Keiko and Hiroshi also speak with the local doctor, Yamaguchi (Usami Jun), who tells them a story of when he saw a ghost during the war. Outside, Hiroshi meets the local gravedigger, who tells Hiroshi that he is willing to exhume Yuko’s coffin – for a price. Hiroshi and the gravedigger travel to the cemetery and dig up the coffin, only to find a mannequin in it instead of the body of Yuko. Hiroshi is soon attacked by Shidu’s servant, Genzo (Takashina Kaku). Meanwhile, Keiko has been locked in a room by Shidu. ![]() Eighteen years later, Akiko (Fujita Midori) is now a young adult living with her sister Natsuko (Emi Sanae) in a house by Lake Fujimi. Both are students, but Akiko is also a budding painter, her current canvas filled with a vivid depiction of a glaring eye. Akiko’s fiancé is Saeki Takashi (Takahashi Choei), a junior doctor at the hospital. She is neighbours with Kyusaku (Takashina Kaku), the caretaker of the houses on the shore of the lake. One day, Kyusaku takes receipt of a delivery: it is a mysterious crate, which Kyusaku discovers contains a coffin. As darkness falls, Kyusaku is attacked by a vampire that was concealed within the coffin. Meanwhile, at the hospital Saeki finds himself attending to a patient who has been partially exsanguinated. The woman, Saeki is told, was found close to Lake Fujimi. ![]() At night, Natsuko encounters the vampire and is bitten by him. She returns home and, uncharacteristically, picks an argument with Akiko in front of Saeki. Later, Natsuko attempts to lure Akiko to a meeting with the vampire. After Natsuko is taken to hospital in a weakened state, Saeki attempts to help Akiko by accompanying her on a journey to find the strange house of vampires that haunts her memories and dreams. ![]() The principal tells Shiraki that he hopes Shiraki will succeed him as the head of the school. Shiraki is surprised and humbled. He meets some of the female students, and also encounters the eccentric French master, Yoshii (Sasaki Katsuhiko), who is given to wandering the grounds quoting Baudelaire to himself. Shiraki makes an ally in the school’s doctor, Shimomura (Tanaka Kunie), who tells Shiraki that one of the students disappeared five days prior to Shiraki’s arrival. This, it seems, is a semi-regular occurrence, one or two students disappearing each year. A collector of folk tales and local lore, Shimomura tells Shiraki that the locals believe this to be a case of the ‘devil […] having his fun’. Shimomura shows Shiraki a partially exposed coffin in the local cemetery. The coffin is said to be 200 years old and belongs to a Caucasian shipwreck victim who was washed ashore and tortured owing to his Christian faith. The shipwreck victim escaped from his captors and wandered the land; starving and dehydrated, he attacked a fifteen year old girl and drank her blood. The locals caught and killed both of them, claiming them to be vampires, and buried them together in the coffin which, Shimomura shows Shiraki, is now empty. ![]() Meanwhile, the principal, a vampire, has attacked one of Keiko’s friends, Kyoko (Aramaki Keiko). The other students are returning home for the holidays, but three roommates – Kyoko, Yukiko (Ota Mio) and Kumi (Mochizuki Mariko) – are left behind. At night, Kyoko lures Yukiko to the vampire before throwing herself off a balcony. His suspicions already aroused, Shimomura follows Yukiko to a nighttime meeting in the woods with the principal. However, Shimomura is attacked by the vampire and disappears. Only Shiraki and Kumi are left at the school; they must unravel the mystery and survive the vampires. ![]() As Jim Harper has suggested, ‘[m]any Japanese vampire films can be unsatisfying for Western audiences, primarily because their creators are either unaware of or disinterested in the various aspects of Western vampire lore’ (Harper, 2016: 27). Where Chinese vampire films, for example, offered a unique ‘spin’ on the subgenre of vampire fiction by working into their narratives elements of local lore (for example, the jiangshi/‘hopping’ vampires found in a number of Chinese films, most famously the Mr Vampire pictures), Japanese vampire pictures ‘had no indigenous [vampire-related] traditions to draw upon’ and thus often saw ‘writers […] creat[ing] their own mythos or taking on concepts from elsewhere’ (ibid.). As a consequence, Yamamoto’s vampire pictures offer strange variations on the paradigms of imported Western vampire films, in particular owing a strong debt to Terence Fisher’s Dracula films. The vampires in Evil of Dracula, for example, seem to use vampirism as a means of transferring their essence from an aging body to a younger body; the plot involves the school principal (a vampire) and his wife (also a vampire) attempting to find new ‘host’ bodies. The principal does this by biting his female victims (his students) on the breast, an act which leads them to falling under his spell. Meanwhile, in Vampire Doll, the concept of vampirism has little impact on the plot – which is essentially a haunted house story with the vampire motif bolted on to it. There are no fangs and no blood drinking; Yuko, reanimated as a ghoul, instead uses a dagger to slash the throats of her victims. Throughout all three films, none of the vampires seem to have particular problems with sunlight, though most of them are dispatched in ways that are familiar from European vampire films (a stake through the heart, in particular). Two of the films feature moments which mirror the denouement of Terence Fisher’s The Horror of Dracula, with the vampires turning to ash in front of the camera. As Jim Harper notes, ‘this unorthodox approach can sometimes be refreshing, bringing in welcome changes to the tradition-bound world of vampire legends’ (ibid.). This would be especially noticeable in the latter days of Hammer’s vampire cycle, during which the studio was recycling the motifs of Terence Fisher’s early Dracula films ad infinitum or trying to do something new and failing miserably (for example, by placing Dracula in the present day in Alan Gibson’s Dracula A.D. 1972, 1972). ![]() Within this film, even characters that embody rationalism are willing to accept the existence of the paranormal. When Keiko and Hiroshi visit Doctor Yamaguchi, he tells them that ‘Science can’t explain occult powers. It’s not my speciality but I’m studying it. I saw a ghost myself’. Yamaguchi tells the couple of his experiences during the war, when he and some of his comrades saw the ghost of one of their fallen friends. Later in the film, it’s revealed that Yuko’s existence after death is, to some extent, a product of science: in a revelation that seems like an obvious tip of the hat to Edgar Allan Poe’s story ‘The Facts in the Case of M Valdemar’, it is revealed that at the moment of her death, Yuko was hypnotised. This is the reason why her consciousness has continued after death. ![]() The film takes place in northern Honshu. Its protagonist Akiko’s work as an artist enables the script to confront some of the overt Freudian symbolism of vampire narratives through various characters’ responses to her strange painting and her recurring dream/memory in which Akiko, as a five year old girl, encounters the vampires in an isolated house by the coast. The painting itself, and its use within the narrative, recalls Abel Ferrara’s use of his protagonist Reno’s painting of a buffalo in the later film Driller Killer, 1979; like Reno’s buffalo painting, Akiko’s painting is a vivid swirl of primary colours with a focal point that is an eye that functions like a black hole, drawing the viewer into it. Neither Reno nor Akiko can explain their fascination with their respective paintings: ‘Don’t ask me’, Akiko responds when her sister asks her what the painting means, ‘I don’t know. I can’t get it out of my head, that eye!’ Akiko’s sister Natsuko decodes Akiko’s recurring dream in psychoanalytic terms, asserting that Akiko’s ‘experience [of] terror at a young age’ is the reason she ‘create[s] illusions of hypothetical enemies’. Meanwhile, in a later sequence, the vampire visits Akiko and reveals himself to be something of an art critic, examining Akiko’s painting and asserting, ‘Don’t be afraid, young lady. I’ve taken a liking to you and that picture of yours. A first-rate work of art. It’s wonderful. The fear felt by the artist is portrayed so vividly’. As in The Vampire Doll, the first character to mention the possibility of vampires is a man of science, a rationalist: it is Saeki, Akiko’s lover and a junior doctor, who makes the connection between the strange events and vampirism, noting that ‘These people that you know, they were all transformed into devils. The marks on their necks, the loss of blood. There’s only one answer: a vampire. Some of those legends about vampires and cannibals, they sound like true stories. Even nowadays, you read about numerous cases of cannibalism […] Shortly after they die, they become vampires themselves. Only fire or a stake through the heart can stop them’. ![]() ![]() Again, as with the previous two films, Evil of Dracula makes its most stereotypically ‘rational’ character, Doctor Shimomura, the first character to suggest a supernatural reason for the disappearances of the students. Shimomura tells Shiraki that ‘The old people round here say that the devil’s having his fun’, and he takes the new teacher to the local graveyard where the 200 year old coffin of the Caucasian shipwreck survivor lies partially exposed. Shimomura is a collector of folklore, telling Shiraki that there are many local stories of vampires.
Video
![]() Arrow’s promotional material for this release says that the three films were transferred ‘from original film elements’ but doesn’t specify what type of film elements these were, though from the evidence here these wouldn’t seem to be negative-sourced transfers. The HD masters were provided to Arrow by Toho. All three films were shot within a few years of each other, seemingly on identical (or near-identical stock), and the video presentations of all three pictures are very similar. Colours are for the most part naturalistic, though there is some expressive use of red lighting and tinting in Lake of Dracula (via the flashbacks and dream sequences) and Evil of Dracula (in a darkroom-set scene), and a couple of sequences have a deliberately desaturated palette (the flashbacks to the shipwreck victim’s trek through the desert in Lake of Dracula, for example). Little to no damage is present throughout all three films. Contrast levels are pleasing, with midtones showing a strong sense of definition. Black levels seem elevated in the nighttime sequences (see the large screengrabs below). Highlights are evenly balanced throughout. There’s some day-for-night footage which looks slightly funky, but probably always did. Detail is good throughout, with fine detail present in closeups – but sometimes there’s a slightly gauzey look which, combined with a relatively coarse structure, suggests these presentations were sourced from positive film elements rather than the negatives. (There are also some shots in all three films which seem out of focus – an issue of the original production rather than a ‘fault’ of this HD presentation.) The encodes-to-disc seem fine, the presentations retaining the structure of 35mm film. In all, these are pleasing presentations of the three films though with some potential room for improvement. The Vampire Doll ![]() ![]() ![]() Lake of Dracula ![]() ![]() ![]() Evil of Dracula ![]() ![]() ![]() For full-size screengrabs from all three films, please scroll down to the bottom of this review.
Audio
All three films feature LPCM 1.0 tracks, in Japanese. These audio tracks are clean and clear, free from distortion, and show good range. Optional English subtitles are included. These are easy to read and free from any distracting errors. Strangely, despite not being listed in the menus or on the documentation accompanying this release, both Lake of Dracula and Evil of Dracula contain the films’ English dubs, also in LPCM 1.0. These dubs aren’t bad at all, and though purists will prefer the Japanese language tracks, they offer an interesting alternative way to view the film. The dub tracks are bassier than the Japanese tracks, with a slightly compressed range, but they’re certainly listen-able.
Extras
![]() The Vampire Doll (71:01) - Kim Newman on The Bloodthirsty Trilogy (16:06). Newman, as affable as ever, discusses the production history of these films and reflects on their relationship with Western vampire pictures. Newman considers the films in the context of other contemporaneous Japanese genre pictures and suggests that though the films didn’t really change the paradigms of Japanese horror films, owing to the fact that they were outnumbered by more traditional Japanese genre pictures, they offered an interesting sidebar in the history of Japanese horror cinema. - Trailers: The Vampire Doll (2:04); Lake of Dracula (2:12); Evil of Dracula (2:22). - Stills Galleries: The Vampire Doll (20 images); Lake of Dracula (9 images); Evil of Dracula (21 images). DISC TWO: Lake of Dracula (81:34) Evil of Dracula (82:47) - Trailers: The Vampire Doll (2:04); Lake of Dracula (2:12); Evil of Dracula (2:22).
Overall
![]() These are certainly very interesting films, and they have been difficult to see – at least, in their original aspect ratios – for a number of years. Arrow’s new Blu-ray release of these three pictures amends this, offering solid presentations of all three films alongside an illuminating albeit brief interview with Kim Newman. The original promotional material, especially the stark monochrome stills, included here is also interesting. Horror fans will find this release to be a pretty essential purchase. References: Harper, Jim, 2016: ‘Bloodthirsty Films’. In: Murgula, Salvador Jimenez (ed), 2016: The Encyclopedia of Japanese Horror Films. London: Rowman and Littlefield: 26-8 Please click to enlarge: The Vampire Doll ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Lake of Dracula ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Evil of Dracula ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||
![]() |